Engineering teams have increasingly sought alternatives to ClickUp as they face mounting challenges with developer workflow integration and project visibility. According to a recent industry survey, many engineering organizations cite developer experience as the primary driver when evaluating project management solutions, with teams losing an average of 5.3 hours weekly to context switching between tools. 

Whether you're struggling with GitHub synchronization or need a more specialized engineering solution, this guide will help you find the perfect alternative for your development team. Start Zenhub's free trial today to see how GitHub-native project management can transform your workflows.

Why Engineering Teams Look Beyond ClickUp

While ClickUp offers robust project management capabilities, engineering teams often encounter specific pain points that hamper productivity and create unnecessary friction in development workflows.

Common Pain Points with ClickUp in Dev Workflows

Limited GitHub Integration → Reduced Visibility → Manual Updates Required
Engineering teams find that ClickUp's GitHub integration lacks seamless synchronization, requiring developers to update platform task statuses manually. In our research, one engineering manager reported that "42% of our sprint planning time was spent reconciling ClickUp data with actual GitHub activity."

Disconnected Development Context → Information Silos → Delayed Decision Making
When using ClickUp, developers must constantly switch between environments to find context for their work. This dev tool integration gap creates information silos that slow decision-making. A common scenario is that engineers need to reference five different places to understand a single feature's requirements.

Inefficient Sprint Management → Planning Overhead → Reduced Coding Time
ClickUp's general-purpose design creates friction in the GitHub workflow during sprint planning and retrospectives. Teams report spending up to 3 hours per week manually updating sprint metrics that could be automatically derived from GitHub activity.

Limited Engineering Metrics → Reduced Transparency → Inaccurate Reporting
Engineering leaders struggle to track essential development metrics like Lead time (total elapsed time from work created to work delivered) directly within ClickUp, often resorting to spreadsheets or additional tools to generate engineering reports.

Resource-Intensive Interface → Performance Issues → Scaling Challenges
As engineering organizations grow, ClickUp's interface becomes increasingly resource-intensive. Teams report significant scaling issues that impact performance when managing multiple repositories or large development teams.

Evaluation Criteria Unique to Software Teams

Engineering leaders typically assess platforms on:

Version-control integration: Enables commit-linked issues and automated status updates between your project management tool and code repositories, creating a single source of truth.

CI/CD hooks: Trigger builds or deployments from project tasks, maintaining consistency between planning and execution phases.

Development visibility: Provides real-time insights into engineering progress with metrics like sprint velocity, cycle time, and code contribution patterns.

GitHub workflow compatibility: Supports pull request workflows, code reviews, and branch management without requiring context switching.

Cross-repository management: Allows teams to organize work across multiple repositories while maintaining a unified view of all development activity.

Customizable engineering workflows: Adapts to Agile, Kanban, or hybrid methodologies with flexible process automation specific to development teams.

Data security and compliance: Offers robust controls for access management, audit logs, and security compliance essential for software development.

ClickUp performs adequately in customization and workflow flexibility but falls short compared to specialized alternatives in native GitHub integration, engineering-specific metrics, and development visibility.

Comparison Snapshot: Top Alternatives at a Glance

Feature and Integration Matrix

*via third-party app or limited integration

Pricing

‍

The 9 Best ClickUp Alternatives for Engineering Teams

1. Zenhub

Zenhub keeps engineers in GitHub while automating sprints and reporting, eliminating context switching and manual updates.

Core strengths: Zenhub integrates directly within the GitHub interface, allowing developers to manage projects without leaving their coding environment. Its unique multi-repository support enables teams to track work across complex projects with dependencies spanning multiple codebases. Automated workflows update task statuses based on GitHub activity, eliminating manual updates and ensuring project data always reflects actual development progress.

AI edge: Zenhub's AI capabilities include automatic sprint planning recommendations, issue estimation, and automated summary reports that analyze sprint performance. The platform's machine learning algorithms improve sprint predictions over time by learning from your team's historical performance data. Zenhub's intelligence is trained explicitly on software development patterns unlike general AI tools.

Security: Enterprise-grade security features include SOC2 compliance, on-premise deployment options, GitHub Enterprise integration, and role-based access controls that respect GitHub permissions. Zenhub maintains complete data segregation between customers in multi-tenant environments.

Ideal fit: Zenhub works best for engineering organizations that want to keep developers in GitHub while providing managers with advanced project metrics and planning tools. Dapper Labs increased epic throughput by 40% after migrating to Zenhub, citing the elimination of context switching as a key productivity driver.

Start your free Zenhub trial today to experience GitHub-native project management.

2. Jira Software

Jira Software is an enterprise-grade, highly configurable project management solution for development teams. Its mature Agile planning tools support Scrum and Kanban methodologies and offer customizable workflows, fields, and states.

The platform offers native integrations with Bitbucket, Jenkins, and over 1,000 Marketplace apps, making it adaptable to various development ecosystems. While not GitHub-native, Jira connects to GitHub through third-party integrations that sync issues, pull requests, and commits.

Jira's reporting capabilities are comprehensive, with burndown charts, sprint reports, and velocity tracking. The platform also features portfolio management for larger organizations that are managing multiple projects.

However, Jira's complexity can be a double-edged sword. The highly configurable nature often translates to higher administrative overhead, with many teams requiring dedicated Jira administrators. The platform's user interface, while recently improved, still presents a steeper learning curve compared to more modern alternatives.

Jira works best for large enterprise teams with complex requirements and the resources to customize and maintain their instance. Organizations already invested in the Atlassian ecosystem will find the integrations particularly valuable.

3. GitHub Projects

GitHub Projects offers first-party convenience for teams living in GitHub, providing basic project management capabilities directly within the development platform. Its tight integration with issues and pull requests creates a seamless connection between planning and code.

The platform features customizable project boards with automated workflows that can move issues through columns based on status changes. Recent enhancements include table views, custom fields, and basic filtering options that improve organization capabilities.

However, GitHub Projects lacks dedicated burndown charts and other sprint analytics that engineering teams rely on for tracking progress. It also offers minimal role-based reporting, making it difficult for managers to get high-level insights without additional tools.

Compared to Zenhub, GitHub Projects falls short on sprint automation, with limited support for planning, estimation, and retrospective analytics. It also lacks multi-repository management capabilities, making coordinating work across complex projects challenging.

GitHub Projects works best for smaller teams with straightforward project management needs who want to stay entirely within the GitHub ecosystem without adding external tools.

4. Linear

Linear stands out with its speed, keyboard-first UI, and modern design, which appeal to engineering teams seeking efficiency. The platform delivers a fast, responsive experience that minimizes friction in daily project management tasks.

Its GitHub integration provides solid PR linkage, allowing developers to connect code changes to issues and automatically update statuses. Linear's roadmap and cycle planning features help teams organize work into manageable sprints with clear priorities.

Linear's AI-powered features include innovative issue suggestions, effort estimation, and insights that help teams identify bottlenecks. The clean interface promotes focus by reducing visual clutter while providing powerful filtering and search capabilities.

However, Linear lacks on-premise deployment options, which may be a dealbreaker for organizations with strict security requirements. Its portfolio views are also more limited than some alternatives, making it less suitable for complex, multi-team projects that require hierarchical organization.

Linear works best for speed-focused engineering teams that value a modern, minimalist interface and aren't constrained by enterprise deployment requirements.

5. Wrike

Wrike delivers robust resource management and Gantt charts that help engineering teams plan complex projects with interdependencies. Its customizable workflows adapt to various development methodologies, and the platform offers strong performance tracking capabilities.

The 3D view of workloads helps managers identify resource constraints and capacity issues before they impact delivery. Wrike's reporting engine generates detailed analytics on team performance, with custom fields that can track engineering-specific metrics.

Wrike integrates with GitHub through its extension marketplace, syncing issue statuses and pull request information. The platform also connects with numerous other tools, including design applications like Adobe Creative Cloud.

However, DevOps teams may find Wrike's setup heavy compared to more developer-focused alternatives. The platform's general-purpose design requires significant configuration to adapt to engineering workflows, and its GitHub integration lacks the seamless experience of native solutions.

Wrike works best for cross-functional teams that need strong resource management capabilities alongside project tracking, particularly when engineering collaborates closely with non-technical departments.

6. Asana

Asana provides intuitive task management with a user-friendly interface that appeals to teams seeking simplicity without sacrificing functionality. Its workflow builder allows teams to create custom processes with conditional logic and automation.

The platform's Timeline view helps visualize project schedules and dependencies, while Portfolios provide a high-level view of multiple projects. Asana's reporting features include burnup charts, status updates, and customizable dashboards.

Asana connects with GitHub through third-party integrations, allowing basic synchronization of issues and pull requests. However, these integrations often lack the depth and reliability of native solutions, requiring manual intervention to maintain alignment.

The platform's strengths lie in cross-functional collaboration rather than engineering-specific workflows. It lacks built-in support for development concepts like sprints, velocity tracking, and code-related metrics that engineering teams rely on.

Asana works best for organizations where engineering teams collaborate closely with non-technical departments and prefer a unified tool across the company, even if it means sacrificing some developer-specific functionality.

7. Monday.com

Monday.com offers exceptional visual workflow customization with its flexible column system and colorful status indicators. The platform allows teams to create custom views representing their unique development processes while maintaining consistency across projects.

Its automation center enables no-code workflow automation based on status changes, dates, or user actions. The platform's dashboards aggregate data from multiple boards to provide high-level insights into project health and team performance.

Monday.com connects to GitHub through its marketplace integrations, enabling basic synchronization between issues and work items. However, these integrations typically provide only one-way updates and lack the deep connection engineering teams need for seamless workflow management.

The platform's general-purpose design requires significant customization to support engineering-specific concepts like sprints, story points, and code metrics. While highly adaptable, this customization represents an overhead that specialized tools don't require.

Monday.com works best for teams prioritizing visual customization and workflow flexibility over engineering-specific features, particularly those collaborating frequently with non-technical stakeholders.

8. Notion

Notion stands out for its unified approach to documentation and task management. It allows teams to build custom knowledge bases alongside project tracking. Its flexible block-based architecture enables engineering teams to create tailored workspaces that combine specs, tasks, and roadmaps.

The platform's database features support relational data structures that can model complex projects with custom properties and views. Notion's template gallery provides starting points for various engineering workflows, from sprint planning to bug tracking.

However, Notion's GitHub integration capabilities are limited compared to specialized alternatives. While basic embedding and linking are possible, the platform lacks automated synchronization between code activity and project tasks, leading to manual updates and potential inconsistencies.

Notion also lacks robust reporting tools for engineering metrics, with limited support for burndown charts, velocity tracking, and other Agile analytics. Teams often need to build these views manually using formulas and rollups, requiring significant setup and maintenance.

Notion works best for engineering teams prioritizing integrated documentation and knowledge management alongside basic project tracking, particularly in smaller organizations where process flexibility outweighs the need for specialized engineering features.

9. Shortcut

Shortcut (formerly Clubhouse) delivers an engineering-focused project management experience with strong GitHub integration and an intuitive interface. The platform's story-based workflow aligns well with Agile development practices, supporting iterations, epics, and milestones.

Its GitHub integration allows bi-directional synchronization, with branch creation directly from stories and automatic status updates based on pull request activity. Shortcut's reporting tools include velocity charts, burndown charts, and cumulative flow diagrams that help teams track progress.

The platform's workflow engine enables custom states and automations that adapt to different engineering processes. Teams can create project-specific workflows while maintaining consistency in reporting and visibility.

However, Shortcut lacks the on-premise deployment options that some enterprise organizations require for security compliance. Its portfolio management capabilities are also less developed than some alternatives, making coordinating large-scale initiatives across multiple teams challenging.

Shortcut works best for mid-sized engineering organizations seeking a balance between developer-friendly workflows and project management structure, particularly those committed to Agile methodologies.

How to Evaluate Project Management Platforms

Integration with Version Control and CI/CD

When evaluating integration capabilities, follow this three-step checklist:

1. Native commit links: Verify that the platform can directly connect tasks to specific commits, branches, and pull requests without requiring manual updates.

2. Automated status updates: Test how the platform responds to GitHub events. Does a merged PR automatically close its associated task? A failing build should reopen the related task or change its status to indicate attention is needed.
3. Branch policies support: Check if the platform can enforce workflow rules based on branch activities, such as requiring linked issues for each PR or blocking merges until reviews are complete.

The depth of integration significantly impacts developer experience. Shallow integrations force developers to manually update task statuses after code changes, while deep integrations automatically reflect real-world progress, reducing administrative overhead.

Agile and Reporting Capabilities

Compare these key reporting features across potential platforms:

• Burndown charts: Should visualize remaining work over time with projections based on current velocity.
• Velocity tracking: To improve estimation accuracy, you must analyze story point completion across multiple sprints 
• Lead and cycle time: Lead time measures duration from task creation to completion, while Cycle time tracks average time from work start to code merged, providing insights into process efficiency.
• Portfolio dashboards: Should aggregate metrics across multiple projects and teams to provide leadership with actionable insights.

Engineering-specific reports that track code quality metrics, technical debt, and deployment frequency provide additional value that general-purpose tools often lack.

Security, Compliance, and Scalability

Enterprise engineering teams should prioritize these security considerations:

Certification compliance: Verify SOC2, ISO 27001, and other relevant certifications based on your industry requirements.

Deployment options: Evaluate on-prem vs. cloud tradeoffs based on your organization's security policies and infrastructure maturity.

User provisioning and access control: Look for platforms that support SCIM, SSO (Single Sign-On), and granular role-based permissions.

Audit logs: Ensure visibility into who accessed or modified tasks, essential for security reviews and incident forensics.

Performance SLAs and data residency: Ask vendors about uptime guarantees and where customer data is stored, especially if your team works under GDPR, HIPAA, or other regional regulations.

Scalability also matters. Some platforms slow down as you add repos, teams, or automation rules. Look for vendors with proven benchmarks on handling enterprise-sized projects and large codebases.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most affordable alternative to ClickUp for small engineering teams?

Answer: GitHub Projects offers a free tier with unlimited repositories, while Zenhub’s Free plan includes sprint automation and supports unlimited repos; both are excellent choices for small teams under 25 developers.

Which tool scales best for enterprise engineering organizations?

Answer: Jira Software and Zenhub Enterprise support SOC2 compliance, on-premise hosting, and granular permissions. However, Zenhub’s GitHub-native experience reduces context switching and simplifies adoption for large engineering teams.

Can I migrate data from ClickUp to Zenhub or other platforms?

Answer: Yes. Zenhub offers an import wizard that directly maps tasks, assignees, and custom fields from ClickUp. Most other platforms support CSV imports or API-based migration to simplify the transition.

How do AI-powered insights differ across these tools?

Answer: Zenhub Pulse generates sprint summaries and engineering investment reports using GPT-based models trained on real development activity. In contrast, ClickUp and Monday.com limit AI to writing task descriptions or setting basic automations.

‍Looking to streamline your engineering workflow?✅ Start your free Zenhub trial today and bring your team closer to their code, without the clutter.